Introduction - Revision history

Oferiks at 09:09, 5 April 2009

2009-04-05T09:09:10Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:09, 5 April 2009
Line 57:		Line 57:


			{{Theory_Source_PFH}}
	[[Category:Theory]]		[[Category:Theory]]

Oferiks at 09:04, 5 April 2009

2009-04-05T09:04:01Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:04, 5 April 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== ~~Primary~~ Objectives ==		== Objectives ==

	The primary objective of this site is to describe the theoretical foundation for the collision and grounding frequency analysis so that interested user of IWRAP MK II may understand the basic theory behind the program.		The primary objective of this site is to describe the theoretical foundation for the collision and grounding frequency analysis so that interested user of IWRAP MK II may understand the basic theory behind the program.
Line 13:		Line 13:
	The page [[History of IWRAP]] gives a more thorough description of how IWRAP has developed over time.		The page [[History of IWRAP]] gives a more thorough description of how IWRAP has developed over time.

	== Risk ~~model~~ ==		== Risk Model ==

	To quantify the risks involved with vessel traffic in specified geographical areas, rational criteria for prediction and evaluation of grounding and collision accidents have to be developed.		To quantify the risks involved with vessel traffic in specified geographical areas, rational criteria for prediction and evaluation of grounding and collision accidents have to be developed.

Oferiks at 09:03, 5 April 2009

2009-04-05T09:03:10Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:03, 5 April 2009
Line 27:		Line 27:
	Subsequently, the collision and ground frequency may be obtained by looping over all vessels operating on the route.		Subsequently, the collision and ground frequency may be obtained by looping over all vessels operating on the route.

	IWRAP MK II program calculates grounding and collision frequencies, it does not include the consequence analysis.		{\| cellpadding="5" cellspacing="5" style="width:100%; border:1px solid #ddcef2; margin-bottom: 0.5em; margin-top: 0.5em; vertical-align:top; background-color:#f9f9f9;"
			\|IWRAP MK II program calculates grounding and collision frequencies, it does not include the consequence analysis.
			\|}

	One of the benefits of the formulated procedure is that it allows comparisons of various navigational routes by assessing the relative frequencies of collisions.		One of the benefits of the formulated procedure is that it allows comparisons of various navigational routes by assessing the relative frequencies of collisions.
Line 35:		Line 37:
	The applied model for calculating the frequency of grounding or collision accident involves the use of a so-called causation probability, that is multiplied onto a theoretically obtained number of grounding or collision candidates.		The applied model for calculating the frequency of grounding or collision accident involves the use of a so-called causation probability, that is multiplied onto a theoretically obtained number of grounding or collision candidates.

	The causation factor models the probability of the officer on the watch not reacting in time given that he is on collision course with another vessel (or alternatively on grounding course).		{\| cellpadding="5" cellspacing="5" style="width:100%; border:1px solid #ddcef2; margin-bottom: 0.5em; margin-top: 0.5em; vertical-align:top; background-color:#f9f9f9;"
			\|The causation factor models the probability of the officer on the watch not reacting in time given that he is on collision course with another vessel (or alternatively on grounding course).
			\|}

	The numerical value of the causation probability is not a unified value but often varies for different geographical locations.		The numerical value of the causation probability is not a unified value but often varies for different geographical locations.

Oferiks: /* History */

2009-04-05T08:58:37Z

History

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:58, 5 April 2009
Line 9:		Line 9:
	During the period 1998 to 2001, state-of-the-art software for grounding and collision analysis was developed within the [[ISESO_Project]] at the Technical University of Denmark.		During the period 1998 to 2001, state-of-the-art software for grounding and collision analysis was developed within the [[ISESO_Project]] at the Technical University of Denmark.

	The [[ISESO_Project]] was followed by a project named [[BaSSy_Project\|BaSSy]].		The [[ISESO_Project]] was followed by a project named [[BaSSy_Project\|BaSSy]]. IWRAP MK II constitutes a reduced version of the collision and grounding analysis program, the BaSSy ToolBox ([[GRISK]]), developed through the [[BaSSy_Project]].

	IWRAP MK II constitutes a reduced version of the collision and grounding analysis program, the BaSSy ToolBox ([[GRISK]]), developed through the [[BaSSy_Project]].

	The page [[History of IWRAP]] gives a more thorough description of how IWRAP has developed over time.		The page [[History of IWRAP]] gives a more thorough description of how IWRAP has developed over time.

Oferiks at 08:52, 5 April 2009

2009-04-05T08:52:11Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:52, 5 April 2009
Line 7:		Line 7:
	== History ==		== History ==

	During the period 1998 to 2001, state-of-the-art software for grounding and collision analysis was developed within the [[ISESO_Project]] at the Technical University of Denmark.		During the period 1998 to 2001, state-of-the-art software for grounding and collision analysis was developed within the [[ISESO_Project]] at the Technical University of Denmark.

			The [[ISESO_Project]] was followed by a project named [[BaSSy_Project\|BaSSy]].

	IWRAP MK II constitutes a reduced version of the collision and grounding analysis program, the BaSSy ToolBox ([[GRISK]]), developed through the [[BaSSy_Project]].		IWRAP MK II constitutes a reduced version of the collision and grounding analysis program, the BaSSy ToolBox ([[GRISK]]), developed through the [[BaSSy_Project]].

			The page [[History of IWRAP]] gives a more thorough description of how IWRAP has developed over time.

	== Risk model ==		== Risk model ==

Oferiks at 08:47, 5 April 2009

2009-04-05T08:47:33Z

Oferiks at 08:46, 5 April 2009

2009-04-05T08:46:00Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:46, 5 April 2009
Line 5:		Line 5:
	It is assumed that the reader assumes a level of mathematical and probabilistic skills to gain full benefit of this site.		It is assumed that the reader assumes a level of mathematical and probabilistic skills to gain full benefit of this site.

	IWRAP MK II constitutes a reduced version of the collision and grounding analysis program, the BaSSy ToolBox ([[GRISK]]), developed through [[BaSSy_Project]].		== History ==

			During the period 1998 to 2001, state-of-the-art software for grounding and collision analysis was developed within the [[ISESO_Project]] at the Technical University of Denmark.

			IWRAP MK II constitutes a reduced version of the collision and grounding analysis program, the BaSSy ToolBox ([[GRISK]]), developed through the [[BaSSy_Project]].

			== Risk model ==

	To quantify the risks involved with vessel traffic in specified geographical areas, rational criteria for prediction and evaluation of grounding and collision accidents have to be developed.		To quantify the risks involved with vessel traffic in specified geographical areas, rational criteria for prediction and evaluation of grounding and collision accidents have to be developed.

	This implies in principle that probabilities as well as the inherent consequences have to be analysed and assessed.		This implies in principle that probabilities as well as the inherent consequences have to be analysed and assessed.

	~~During the period 1998 to 2001, state-of-the-art software for grounding and collision analysis was developed within the [[ISESO_Project]] at the Technical University of Denmark.~~

	This site (IWRAP) not only defines the theoretical background for the collision and grounding analysis, but it also summarises and discusses the background for the so-called causation probability.		This site (IWRAP) not only defines the theoretical background for the collision and grounding analysis, but it also summarises and discusses the background for the so-called causation probability.
Line 17:		Line 21:
	A method for evaluating the collision and grounding frequency of vessels operating on a specified route is outlined.		A method for evaluating the collision and grounding frequency of vessels operating on a specified route is outlined.

	In order to identify the frequency of experiencing any collision or grounding in a given area involves first a specification of the routes and the associated traffic on the routes~~. Subsequently, the collision and ground frequency may be obtained by looping over all vessels operating on the route~~.		In order to identify the frequency of experiencing any collision or grounding in a given area involves first a specification of the routes and the associated traffic on the routes.

	~~Knowing~~ the ~~structural damage the resulting consequences in terms of bunker oil outflow~~ and ~~cargo outflow~~ may ~~subsequently be calculated. In future more consequence models will~~ be ~~implemented in~~ the ~~BaSSy program~~. ~~The~~		Subsequently, the collision and ground frequency may be obtained by looping over all vessels operating on the route.

	IWRAP MK II program does not include the consequence analysis ~~package~~.		IWRAP MK II program calculates grounding and collision frequencies, it does not include the consequence analysis.

	One of the benefits of the formulated procedure is that it allows comparisons of various navigational routes by assessing the relative frequencies of collisions.		One of the benefits of the formulated procedure is that it allows comparisons of various navigational routes by assessing the relative frequencies of collisions.

	The applied model for calculating the frequency of grounding or collision accident involves the use of a so-called causation probability that is multiplied onto a theoretically obtained number of grounding or collision candidates.		== Causation Probability ==

			The applied model for calculating the frequency of grounding or collision accident involves the use of a so-called causation probability, that is multiplied onto a theoretically obtained number of grounding or collision candidates.

	The causation factor models the probability of the officer on the watch not reacting in time given that he is on collision course with another vessel (or alternatively on grounding course).		The causation factor models the probability of the officer on the watch not reacting in time given that he is on collision course with another vessel (or alternatively on grounding course).

	The numerical value of the causation probability is not a unified value but often varies for different geographical locations.		The numerical value of the causation probability is not a unified value but often varies for different geographical locations.
Line 36:		Line 42:

	Some of the factors that are of importance when assessing the causation probability are also identified.		Some of the factors that are of importance when assessing the causation probability are also identified.


			== Bayesian Network for ship-ship collision ==

	Moreover, a Bayesian Network model for ship-ship collision is formulated for an analytical estimation of the causation probability.		Moreover, a Bayesian Network model for ship-ship collision is formulated for an analytical estimation of the causation probability.

	The obtained result agrees well with that obtained from statistical analyses of data.		The obtained result agrees well with that obtained from statistical analyses of data.







	[[Category:Theory]]		[[Category:Theory]]

77.212.19.97 at 08:27, 5 April 2009

2009-04-05T08:27:13Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:27, 5 April 2009
Line 5:		Line 5:
	It is assumed that the reader assumes a level of mathematical and probabilistic skills to gain full benefit of this site.		It is assumed that the reader assumes a level of mathematical and probabilistic skills to gain full benefit of this site.

	IWRAP MK II constitutes a reduced version of the collision and grounding analysis program, the BaSSy ToolBox (GRISK) ~~being~~ developed through ~~the~~ [[~~The_BaSSy_Project~~]].		IWRAP MK II constitutes a reduced version of the collision and grounding analysis program, the BaSSy ToolBox ([[GRISK]]), developed through [[BaSSy_Project]].

	To quantify the risks involved with vessel traffic in specified geographical areas, rational criteria for prediction and evaluation of grounding and collision accidents have to be developed.		To quantify the risks involved with vessel traffic in specified geographical areas, rational criteria for prediction and evaluation of grounding and collision accidents have to be developed.
Line 11:		Line 11:
	This implies in principle that probabilities as well as the inherent consequences have to be analysed and assessed.		This implies in principle that probabilities as well as the inherent consequences have to be analysed and assessed.

	During the period 1998 to 2001, state-of-the-art software for grounding and collision analysis was developed within the [[~~The_ISESO_Project~~]] at the Technical University of Denmark.		During the period 1998 to 2001, state-of-the-art software for grounding and collision analysis was developed within the [[ISESO_Project]] at the Technical University of Denmark.

	This site (IWRAP) not only defines the theoretical background for the collision and grounding analysis, but it also summarises and discusses the background for the so-called causation probability.		This site (IWRAP) not only defines the theoretical background for the collision and grounding analysis, but it also summarises and discusses the background for the so-called causation probability.

77.212.19.97: /* Primary Objectives */

2009-04-05T08:12:19Z

Primary Objectives

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:12, 5 April 2009
Line 5:		Line 5:
	It is assumed that the reader assumes a level of mathematical and probabilistic skills to gain full benefit of this site.		It is assumed that the reader assumes a level of mathematical and probabilistic skills to gain full benefit of this site.

	IWRAP MK II constitutes a reduced version of the collision and grounding analysis program, the BaSSy ToolBox (GRISK) being developed through the [[~~The_BaSSY_Project~~]].		IWRAP MK II constitutes a reduced version of the collision and grounding analysis program, the BaSSy ToolBox (GRISK) being developed through the [[The_BaSSy_Project]].

	To quantify the risks involved with vessel traffic in specified geographical areas, rational criteria for prediction and evaluation of grounding and collision accidents have to be developed.		To quantify the risks involved with vessel traffic in specified geographical areas, rational criteria for prediction and evaluation of grounding and collision accidents have to be developed.

77.212.19.97 at 08:11, 5 April 2009

2009-04-05T08:11:02Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:11, 5 April 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:

	== Primary Objectives ==		== Primary Objectives ==

	The primary objective of this site is to describe the theoretical foundation for the collision and grounding frequency analysis so that interested user of IWRAP MK II may understand the basic theory behind the program.		The primary objective of this site is to describe the theoretical foundation for the collision and grounding frequency analysis so that interested user of IWRAP MK II may understand the basic theory behind the program.

	It is assumed that the reader assumes a level of mathematical and probabilistic skills to gain full benefit of this site.		It is assumed that the reader assumes a level of mathematical and probabilistic skills to gain full benefit of this site.

	IWRAP MK II constitutes a reduced version of the collision and grounding analysis program, the BaSSy ToolBox (GRISK) being developed through the [[~~BaSSY_Project~~]].		IWRAP MK II constitutes a reduced version of the collision and grounding analysis program, the BaSSy ToolBox (GRISK) being developed through the [[The_BaSSY_Project]].

	To quantify the risks involved with vessel traffic in specified geographical areas, rational criteria for prediction and evaluation of grounding and collision accidents have to be developed.		To quantify the risks involved with vessel traffic in specified geographical areas, rational criteria for prediction and evaluation of grounding and collision accidents have to be developed.
Line 22:		Line 22:

	IWRAP MK II program does not include the consequence analysis package.		IWRAP MK II program does not include the consequence analysis package.

	One of the benefits of the formulated procedure is that it allows comparisons of various navigational routes by assessing the relative frequencies of collisions.		One of the benefits of the formulated procedure is that it allows comparisons of various navigational routes by assessing the relative frequencies of collisions.

			The applied model for calculating the frequency of grounding or collision accident involves the use of a so-called causation probability that is multiplied onto a theoretically obtained number of grounding or collision candidates.

			The causation factor models the probability of the officer on the watch not reacting in time given that he is on collision course with another vessel (or alternatively on grounding course).

	The applied model for calculating the frequency of grounding or collision accident involves the use of a so-called causation probability that is multiplied onto a theoretically obtained number of grounding or collision candidates.		The numerical value of the causation probability is not a unified value but often varies for different geographical locations.
	~~The causation factor models the probability of the officer on the watch not reacting in time given that he is on collision course with another vessel (or alternatively on grounding course).~~
	The numerical value of the causation probability is not a unified value but often varies for different geographical locations. The applied value of the causation probability is therefore typically adjusted by a calibration to registered data.		The applied value of the causation probability is therefore typically adjusted by a calibration to registered data.
	On the basis of a literature search the present document summarises some of the causation probabilities that have been applied in different studies. Some of the factors that are of importance when assessing the causation probability are also identified. Moreover, a Bayesian Network model for ship-ship collision is formulated for an analytical estimation of the causation probability. The obtained result agrees well with that obtained from statistical analyses of data.
			On the basis of a literature search the present document summarises some of the causation probabilities that have been applied in different studies.

			Some of the factors that are of importance when assessing the causation probability are also identified.

			Moreover, a Bayesian Network model for ship-ship collision is formulated for an analytical estimation of the causation probability.

			The obtained result agrees well with that obtained from statistical analyses of data.

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:47, 5 April 2009
Line 25:		Line 25:
	Subsequently, the collision and ground frequency may be obtained by looping over all vessels operating on the route.		Subsequently, the collision and ground frequency may be obtained by looping over all vessels operating on the route.

	IWRAP MK II program calculates grounding and collision frequencies, it does not include the consequence analysis.		IWRAP MK II program calculates grounding and collision frequencies, it does not include the consequence analysis.

	One of the benefits of the formulated procedure is that it allows comparisons of various navigational routes by assessing the relative frequencies of collisions.		One of the benefits of the formulated procedure is that it allows comparisons of various navigational routes by assessing the relative frequencies of collisions.
Line 33:		Line 33:
	The applied model for calculating the frequency of grounding or collision accident involves the use of a so-called causation probability, that is multiplied onto a theoretically obtained number of grounding or collision candidates.		The applied model for calculating the frequency of grounding or collision accident involves the use of a so-called causation probability, that is multiplied onto a theoretically obtained number of grounding or collision candidates.

	The causation factor models the probability of the officer on the watch not reacting in time given that he is on collision course with another vessel (or alternatively on grounding course).		The causation factor models the probability of the officer on the watch not reacting in time given that he is on collision course with another vessel (or alternatively on grounding course).

	The numerical value of the causation probability is not a unified value but often varies for different geographical locations.		The numerical value of the causation probability is not a unified value but often varies for different geographical locations.
Line 42:		Line 42:

	Some of the factors that are of importance when assessing the causation probability are also identified.		Some of the factors that are of importance when assessing the causation probability are also identified.


	== Bayesian Network for ship-ship collision ==		== Bayesian Network for ship-ship collision ==
Line 49:		Line 48:

	The obtained result agrees well with that obtained from statistical analyses of data.		The obtained result agrees well with that obtained from statistical analyses of data.




	[[Category:Theory]]		[[Category:Theory]]